Welcome.AI
    Skip to content
    AI Agents

    Enterprises Address AI Reliability Challenges Amid Rebuilding Efforts

    Enterprises are realizing that deploying AI agents requires more than speed; a reliable architecture is crucial. As they navigate the complexities of long-running workflows, many are now in a 'rebuild era' to enhance reliability and operational performance.

    venturebeat.com•May 29, 2026•3 min read

    Key Facts

    • Enterprises face reliability issues in AI workflows, risking increased costs and poor customer experience.
    • Many companies are rebuilding AI agents, indicating vulnerabilities in initial rapid deployment strategies.
    • Visibility into token spending is crucial; orchestration can save costs by resuming from failure points.

    Summary

    As enterprises increasingly deploy AI agents, they are encountering significant reliability challenges that threaten the effectiveness of these systems in production environments. The initial rush to implement AI solutions has led many organizations to overlook critical aspects of system architecture, resulting in frequent failures and costly inefficiencies. This emerging reliability problem necessitates a strategic reevaluation of AI workflows, emphasizing the need for robust orchestration, state management, and recovery mechanisms.

    Preeti Somal, Senior VP of Engineering at Temporal Technologies, highlights that the performance of large language models (LLMs) is not the sole determinant of an AI agent's success. Instead, the durability of the underlying architecture plays a crucial role. Many enterprises are now finding themselves in a "rebuild era," where they must redesign their AI systems to ensure they can withstand interruptions and maintain operational continuity. This shift reflects a broader realization that effective AI deployment requires more than just rapid implementation; it demands a solid foundation capable of managing complex, long-running workflows that span multiple services and tools.

    The complexity of agentic AI systems introduces new engineering challenges, particularly as workflows become more intricate and time-consuming. Enterprises are discovering that failures in these workflows can lead to increased operational costs, as restarting processes from the beginning can multiply inference expenses and degrade customer experiences. Somal draws parallels to the early days of cloud adoption, where organizations migrated workloads without modernizing their architectures, ultimately leading to higher costs without corresponding value.

    To address these challenges, enterprises must adopt a new architectural framework that prioritizes reliability and visibility. Somal introduces the concept of a "deterministic spine," which serves as a guiding structure for AI workflows. This framework allows for consistent execution, even when the underlying models produce variable outputs. By ensuring that workflows can recover from failures without incurring excessive costs, organizations can enhance the overall efficiency of their AI systems.

    Visibility into operational costs is becoming increasingly critical as enterprises assess the return on investment (ROI) of their AI initiatives. Long-running agents often involve multiple model calls, leading to opaque spending patterns that can obscure where resources are being consumed. By implementing orchestration solutions that provide step-by-step visibility, organizations can better manage their token expenditures and identify areas for cost optimization.

    Governance is another key consideration as enterprises navigate the complexities of agentic AI. Rather than relying on fully managed systems, organizations are seeking standardized internal frameworks that offer flexibility while ensuring compliance with governance controls and cost management strategies. This approach allows enterprises to build "paved paths" that facilitate the integration of AI technologies while addressing their unique operational requirements.

    As organizations revisit their initial AI deployments, the focus is shifting from merely enhancing model performance to addressing systemic engineering challenges. Temporal Technologies is well-positioned to support enterprises in this transition, leveraging its existing infrastructure to extend AI capabilities and enhance workflow reliability.

    In conclusion, the current landscape of enterprise AI demands a strategic pivot towards reliability and orchestration. Business leaders must prioritize the redesign of AI workflows to ensure they can withstand interruptions and deliver consistent performance. By investing in robust architectural frameworks and enhancing visibility into operational costs, organizations can not only improve the effectiveness of their AI agents but also drive greater value from their technology investments. This strategic focus will be essential for maintaining a competitive edge in an increasingly AI-driven marketplace.

    Entities Mentioned

    Companies

    Temporal Technologies
    Abridge

    Technologies

    AI
    large language models
    workflow orchestration

    People

    Preeti Somal

    Key Concepts

    reliability problem
    workflow orchestration
    state management
    memory in AI
    deterministic spine
    cost visibility
    governance in AI
    enterprise modernization

    Definitions

    workflow orchestration
    The coordination of multiple processes and services to ensure reliable execution of tasks in AI systems.
    state management
    The process of tracking the current status of an agent's execution to facilitate recovery after failures.
    deterministic spine
    A framework for ensuring reliable execution in AI systems, allowing for recovery from failures while maintaining workflow continuity.
    memory in AI
    The context or information an agent retains across interactions to inform future actions.
    governance in AI
    The establishment of policies and frameworks to manage AI systems effectively while ensuring compliance and flexibility.

    Use Cases

    • →healthcare workflows processing physician visits
    • →customer support escalation processes
    • →compliance processes
    • →procurement workflows
    • →model call management
    • →cost management in AI workflows

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the reliability problem in enterprise AI?

    The reliability problem refers to the challenges organizations face in ensuring that AI agents can perform consistently in production environments, especially when workflows are long-running and complex.

    How does workflow orchestration improve AI performance?

    Workflow orchestration enhances AI performance by coordinating multiple processes, managing state, and ensuring that agents can recover from failures without restarting entire workflows.

    What is the deterministic spine concept?

    The deterministic spine is a framework that ensures reliable execution in AI systems by allowing for recovery from failures while maintaining the overall workflow continuity.

    Why is cost visibility important in AI workflows?

    Cost visibility is crucial because it helps organizations understand where expenses accumulate in complex workflows, enabling better management of AI-related costs and improving overall efficiency.

    What governance concerns arise with agentic AI?

    Governance concerns include the need for standardized frameworks that provide guardrails for AI systems, ensuring compliance, model selection policies, and effective cost management.

    Where AI Leaders Stay Informed

    The latest AI intelligence, case studies, and research — delivered to your inbox every week.

    Free to read. Unsubscribe anytime.